about us

 

Compliance Advisor Ombudsman

 
about us
compliance
advisor
ombudsman
archive
home



CAO site web

 

cao-compliance@ifc.org
tel: 202 458 1973
fax: 202 522 7400

 

Democratic Republic of Congo- Dikulushi Copper-Silver Mine

Issue

On July 27, 2005 the President of the World Bank Group, Paul Wolfowitz, requested that the CAO audit the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency’s (MIGA’s) due diligence for the Dikulushi Copper-Silver Mining Project in Katanga Province of The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). A key issue addressed by the audit related to MIGA’s due diligence with respect to security and human rights.

Background

The project was developed by Anvil Mining, a Canadian company, and has been in production since 2002. Anvil Mining provided logistical support to the army in October 2004. When the town of Kilwa, some 50 kilometers from Dikulushi, was taken over by a small rebel group. Kilwa is the point of export for Dikulushi copper and silver concentrates to Zambia. In reestablishing control over the town, the armed forces of the DRC allegedly killed civilians, including by summary execution, looted, and carried out other crimes including extortion and illegal detention. In April 2005, Contracts of Guarantee were issued by MIGA providing $13.3 million of political risk insurance.

CAO Findings

CAO found that MIGA adequately followed its underwriting and risk management due diligence, but that these core business processes did not address whether the project might either influence the dynamics of conflict or whether security provision for the project could indirectly lead to adverse impacts on the local community. While MIGA’s initial adherence to its Environmental and Social Review Procedures (ESRPs) was adequate, CAO considers that its follow-through on some social aspects was weak. CAO found that weaknesses in the ESRP due diligence, and on conflict and security issues specifically, echo a number of concerns that were the subject of recommendations by CAO in its 2002 review of MIGA’s ESRPs. 

Regarding security and human rights, CAO found that MIGA did not fully understand the implications for its client of implementing the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (as required by the Management Response to the Extractive Industries Review), nor did it assess whether its client had the capacity to properly implement them.

CAO also notes with approval that in its due diligence, MIGA for the first time took steps to engage with NGOs at the project level and to include provisions in the Contracts of Guarantee to reinforce the potential local benefits.

The full text of the report can be found below, including a comprehensive account of the findings and recommendations.

 

Current Status of the Audit

The audit was completed in late November 2005 and posted on the CAO’s website in early February 2006. (See also the CAO Press Release for the process to be followed for future audit reports).

 
Documents

CAO Audit of MIGA's Due Diligence of the Dikulushi Copper-Silver Mining Project in The Democratic Republic of the Congo

French/pdf

CAO Audit of MIGA's Due Diligence of the Dikulushi Copper-Silver Mining Project in The Democratic Republic of the Congo

English/pdf

CAO Releases First Audit Under Wolfowitz and Outlines New Process for Release of Future Audits

English/pdf

CAO Releases First Audit Under Wolfowitz and Outlines New Process for Release of Future Audits

French/pdf

 

 

This page last updated:3/15/2006