Find useful tools and resources for enhancing the effectiveness of existing grievance mechanisms, as well as implementing best practice in the creation of new grievance mechanisms. We trust these tools will serve as best practice guides to those tasked with consulting on, designing, implementing, and assessing grievance mechanisms.
Identifying who is responsible for different elements of grievance mechanism implementation and operation
Useful for: company managers, operations staff, grievance mechanism implementers
Identifying the best qualities and qualifications for dedicated grievance mechanism staff or identifying staff in other company roles who might be the most effective contact person for the grievance mechanism
Useful for: company managers, grievance mechanism practitioners
Choosing the most effective methods for promoting a grievance mechanism
Useful for: company managers, operations staff, grievance mechanism implementers
Developing acknowledgement letters that contain the relevant information for complainants
Useful for: managers, operations staff, grievance mechanism implementers
Assessing which barriers may be causing a grievance mechanism to be ineffective and identifying possible solutions
Useful for: managers, operations staff, grievance mechanism implementers
Rapidly assessing the potential challenge areas of existing grievance mechanisms
Useful for: grievance mechanism experts
Finding resources and definitions for different elements of a grievance mechanism and responses to frequently asked questions
Useful for: company managers, operations staff, implementers of grievance mechanisms
Developing a written structure for a grievance mechanism procedure
Useful for: company managers, implementers of grievance mechanisms
This case is particularly helpful for projects/operations with a large land footprint; operations that may be in competition with local means of income generation or subsistence; and agricultural producers.
This case study is particularly helpful for projects: with an existing operation/facility; located in an urban or densely populated area; that have an operation/facility that could be contributing to cumulative impacts; that have an operation/facility that has impacts that may require further investigation.
This case study is particularly helpful for projects/operations: in the exploration or development phase of a project; in an area where the local community depends on land for income (e.g., farming); in a situation that require the extensive use of subcontractors.
An appealing solution: OmniCorp has purchased a mine that has unresolved concerns over compensation for land access as well as ongoing complaints related to operations. Understand how OmniCorp designs a process that involves the community in resolving these pressing issues.
This case study is particularly helpful for projects/operations with: inherited issues from a previous operator; issues of compensation; a large land footprint; or in the exploration or development phase of a project.
Tool
This 2008 guide consolidates knowledge and lessons regarding grievance resolution from various sources, including CAO’s on-the-ground experiences, findings from studies on grievance resolution in the workplace and in environmental conflict resolution, and practical experience in establishing peace accords and procedures in post-conflict disputes over land and property. It includes an extensive review of grievance mechanisms from the field of conflict resolution. It also draws on first-hand accounts of industry personnel, academics, NGOs, international financial institutions, consultants, and others focused on the challenges involved in designing and implementing grievance mechanisms and the practical strategies and steps required for an effective system.
Tool
Tool
Tool