India: Tata Tea-02/Assam
Case Tracker
Complaint Overview
Peoples’ Action for Development; Promotion and Advancement of Justice, Harmony and Rights of Adivasis, Diocesan Board of Social Services
Labor and working conditions
Project Information
US$7.87 million equity
Synopsis
In 2009, IFC made an equity investment in Amalgamated Plantations Private Limited (APPL). APPL is the second-largest producer and supplier of tea in India. APPL employs over 28,000 permanent workers and over 23,000 temporary workers. There are approximately 155,000 people living on APPL’s 25 tea plantations.
In February 2013, three local civil society organizations (CSOs) filed a complaint on behalf of tea workers employed at and living in APPL’s tea plantation areas. The complaint highlighted issues at three plantations concerning labor conditions, including long hours, unpaid compensation, poor hygiene, health problems, and restrictions on freedom of association. Additionally, it questioned a worker share-buying program, alleging that workers were pressured into purchasing shares without adequate information on the risks.
In November 2013, the case was transferred to the Compliance function for appraisal.
In February 2014, CAO completed its Compliance Appraisal Report for the Tata Tea-02 complaint, deciding that the issues raised in the complaint merited further investigation.
For purposes of the compliance investigation, the Tata Tea 01 and Tata Tea-02/Assam cases were merged after appraisal.
In November 2016, CAO published its combined Compliance Investigation Report. CAO's investigation found several non-compliance issues with IFC's assessment and management of environmental and social (E&S) risks related to their investment. Despite the potential for significant development impact, IFC's pre-investment E&S review was inadequate, leading to poorly detailed mitigation measures that failed to address key risks. During supervision, IFC did not ensure compliance with its Performance Standards (PS), leaving E&S issues raised by complainants unresolved. The investigation also identified specific non-compliance in IFC’s handling of living and working conditions on plantations, use of banned pesticides, information disclosure, consultation, and response to security incidents.
In response to CAO's compliance investigation, IFC acknowledged that APPL was implementing an action plan to address issues in human health, worker safety, housing, and sanitation. IFC committed to: (a) commissioning a third-party annual audit and worker perception survey for APPL's 25 estates; (b) updating its legal opinion on APPL's compliance with national minimum wage laws; and (c) ensuring the action plan was disclosed to and consulted with workers.
CAO Monitoring Reports
In January 2019, CAO published its first Compliance Monitoring Report, indicating that APPL reported some progress on the action plan. However, complainants claimed that workers were not consulted and expressed concerns about the progress and quality of implementation. CAO communicated with IFC staff, complainant representatives, and the IFC client in addition to reviewing project documentation. CAO’s first monitoring report concluded that IFC's supervision was limited and did not satisfactorily address CAO's non-compliance findings. CAO remained concerned that IFC's supervision lacked the necessary information to assess client compliance with PS, leaving IFC without assurance that compliance was on track.
In May 2024, CAO concluded its second Monitoring Report, (included in Q4 FY2024 Omnibus Report, available in English), noting some progress in implementing the Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP), but highlighting that critical infrastructure improvements, such as new or repaired houses and sanitation, were still incomplete and lacked identified financial resources.
In April 2026, CAO published its third Monitoring Report (included in the Q3 FY2026 Omnibus Monitoring Report available in English). The report noted that longstanding commitments under IFC’s management response, including infrastructure improvements, independent audits, and sector studies remain unimplemented. These gaps persist despite the extended timeframe since CAO’s compliance findings in 2016. As this project remains an active investment of IFC, CAO decided to keep this case under compliance monitoring.
This case is open in compliance monitoring.
Status as of April 15, 2026.