Russian Federation: Russky Mir II-02/Taman

Date Filed
01 Feb 2008
Status
Closed
Phase
Dispute Resolution (DR), Compliance
Country
Russia

Case Tracker

Eligibility
Eligibility
Assessment
Assessment
Dispute Resolution
Mediation
Transferred
Compliance
Appraisal
Closed
CURRENT Status
Appraisal (COMPLIANCE)
Closed

Complaint Overview

Complainant

Local resident (farmer)

Cross-Cutting Issues
Community Health and Safety Land Resettlement Land

Project Information

Region
Europe & Central Asia
Institution
IFC
Name & Number
Russkiy Mir II 23870
Company
JSC SFAT
Sector
Infrastructure
Department
Infrastructure
Category
B
Commitment

$45 million (A Loan) & $55 million (B Loan)

Synopsis

Complaint

The Russkiy Mir II project involves an IFC loan of up to $100 million to develop and build the Taman LPG/Fuel Oil terminal and port in the Black Sea, to purchase and expand rail maintenance facilities, to purchase locomotives and rail cars, and to purchase a wheel-making / spare-parts manufacturer and other rail-related infrastructure. In February 2008, a farmer living next to the project site lodged a complaint with CAO expressing concern about the proximity of a gas pipeline near his home. The complainant believes that the location of the pipeline violates Russian legislation and jeopardizes the safety and well being of his family. He requested that the company relocate him to a new location, or that it compensate him for suffering endured as a result of the situation.

CAO Action

A CAO Ombudsman team conducted an assessment and site visit in March 2008, and held meetings with the complainant and his family to discuss the concerns. An NGO representing the complainant – Save Taman! – committed to assisting the complainant in scheduling a meeting directly with Russkiy Mir management so that the parties could discuss the situation directly. CAO monitored this verbal agreement, and reported the outcome to Russkiy Mir management.

Status

Several months following the Ombudsman assessment trip, the complainant reported to CAO that the NGO no longer represented his interests, and requested a withdrawal of his case from the CAO complaint handling process. In order to ensure there are no outstanding issues regarding this complaint, the CAO transferred the case to CAO compliance for appraisal. The complainant’s name remains confidential at his request. CAO Compliance conducted an appraisal and concluded that an audit of IFC was not merited. The case is closed.

Case Documents

  • Dispute Resolution

    Assessment Report(s)
    Assessment Report
    Feb 01, 2009
    English
    Assessment Report
    Assessment Report
    Feb 01, 2009
    Russian
    Assessment Report
  • Appraisal Report(s)
    Appraisal Report: Cases of Save Taman/North Caucus Environmental Watch and a Local Stakeholder
    Oct 16, 2009
    English
    Appraisal Report: Cases of Save Taman/North Caucus Environmental Watch and a Local Stakeholder